FER0239956: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0239956.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fer_0239956.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=EIR 12(4)(a) | |dnd_section=EIR 12(4)(a) | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 22:22, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0239956
- Date: 4 February 2010
- Public Authority: Cheshire East Council (formerly Macclesfield Borough Council)
- Summary: The complainant requested copies of two reports he believed had been produced by the Council and Cheshire Constabulary following an investigative visit made to his property connected to a planning application. The Council official involved along with the Chartered Surveyor informed the complainant that no such report had been prepared by the public authority and that the police report was not held by the Council. The Commissioner has investigated these matters and has decided on the balance of probabilities the requested information is not held by the Council. He therefore does not require the public authority to take any remedial steps in this case. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12(4)(a) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions