Template:DNSummaryBox: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
* Case Ref | example data: | ||
* Date | * Case Ref: FS50229762 | ||
* Public Authority: | * Date: 19/04/2010 | ||
* Public Authority: Public Authority::Ministry of Justice | |||
* Summary: The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request. | * Summary: The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request. | ||
* View PDF of Decision Notice FS50229762 <nowiki>http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf</nowiki> | |||
* View PDF of Decision Notice FS50229762 | |||
Need to include this separately: | |||
* Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 16 - Complaint Upheld | |||
* Usage: | * Usage: | ||
Line 20: | Line 23: | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
<includeonly> | |||
[[Category:ICO Decision Notice]] | |||
</includeonly> | |||
== Decision Summary == | == Decision Summary == | ||
* Case Ref: [[Decision Notice Reference::{{{dn_ref}}}]] | * '''Case Ref:''' [[Decision Notice Reference::{{{dn_ref}}}]] | ||
* Date: [[Decision Notice Date::{{{dn_date}}}]] | * '''Date:''' [[Decision Notice Date::{{{dn_date}}}]] | ||
* Public Authority: [[Public Authority::{{{dn_pa}}}]] | * '''Public Authority:''' [[Public Authority::{{{dn_pa}}}]] | ||
* Summary: {{{dn_summary}}} | * '''Summary:''' {{{dn_summary}}} | ||
* View PDF of Decision Notice [[Decision URL::{{{dn_url}}}| ]] [{{{dn_url}}} | * '''View PDF of Decision Notice:''' [[Decision URL::{{{dn_url}}}| ]] [{{{dn_url}}}] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:37, 3 April 2011
example data:
- Case Ref: FS50229762
- Date: 19/04/2010
- Public Authority: Public Authority::Ministry of Justice
- Summary: The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request.
- View PDF of Decision Notice FS50229762 http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf
Need to include this separately:
- Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 16 - Complaint Upheld
- Usage:
- {{DNSummaryBox
- |dn_ref=xxxxxxx
- |dn_date=xxxx
- |dn_pa=xxxx
- |dn_summary=xxxx
- |dn_url=xxxxx
- }}
- grr, doesn't seem easy to pass in array of decisions for parsing in template eg f1=u~f2=n~f3=x... so using a separate template.
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: {{{dn_ref}}}
- Date: {{{dn_date}}}
- Public Authority: {{{dn_pa}}}
- Summary: {{{dn_summary}}}
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [{{{dn_url}}}]