FS50256879: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50256879 | |dn_ref=FS50256879 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=3 December 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Home Office | |dn_pa=Home Office | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to fraud in landed property. The Home Office advised that it would exceed the cost limit to establish if it holds the requested information. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Home Office acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to fraud in landed property. The Home Office advised that it would exceed the cost limit to establish if it holds the requested information. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Home Office acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:40, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50256879
- Date: 3 December 2009
- Public Authority: Home Office
- Summary: The complainant requested information relating to fraud in landed property. The Home Office advised that it would exceed the cost limit to establish if it holds the requested information. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Home Office acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 12 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
