FS50256879: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
 
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50256879
|dn_ref=FS50256879
|dn_date=03/12/2009
|dn_date=3 December 2009
|dn_pa=Home Office
|dn_pa=Home Office
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to fraud in landed property. The Home Office advised that it would exceed the cost limit to establish if it holds the requested information. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Home Office acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to fraud in landed property. The Home Office advised that it would exceed the cost limit to establish if it holds the requested information. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Home Office acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 12
|dnd_section=FOI 12
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:40, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50256879
  • Date: 3 December 2009
  • Public Authority: Home Office
  • Summary: The complainant requested information relating to fraud in landed property. The Home Office advised that it would exceed the cost limit to establish if it holds the requested information. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Home Office acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]