FS50241934: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50241934 | |dn_ref=FS50241934 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=4 November 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Common Council of the City of London | |dn_pa=Common Council of the City of London | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=The complainant made a request to the City of London for legal advice which led to a decision by the public authority to grant the Church of Scientology Religious Education College mandatory relief in relation to the business rates it is charged. The public authority refused to disclose the information on the basis of the exemption contained in section 42 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated the complaint and has upheld the public authority’s application of section 42. The Commissioner requires no steps to be taken. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50241934.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50241934.pdf | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 22:39, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50241934
- Date: 4 November 2009
- Public Authority: Common Council of the City of London
- Summary: The complainant made a request to the City of London for legal advice which led to a decision by the public authority to grant the Church of Scientology Religious Education College mandatory relief in relation to the business rates it is charged. The public authority refused to disclose the information on the basis of the exemption contained in section 42 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated the complaint and has upheld the public authority’s application of section 42. The Commissioner requires no steps to be taken. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 42 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions