FS50197237: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50197237 | |dn_ref=FS50197237 | ||
|dn_date=19 | |dn_date=19 March 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency | |dn_pa=Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant asked the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (the DVLA) for information relating to the number of surviving A40 Farinas (a classic compact car introduced by the British Motor Corporation in 1958). The Commissioner found that the DVLA acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded. | |dn_summary=The complainant asked the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (the DVLA) for information relating to the number of surviving A40 Farinas (a classic compact car introduced by the British Motor Corporation in 1958). The Commissioner found that the DVLA acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:37, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50197237
- Date: 19 March 2009
- Public Authority: Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- Summary: The complainant asked the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (the DVLA) for information relating to the number of surviving A40 Farinas (a classic compact car introduced by the British Motor Corporation in 1958). The Commissioner found that the DVLA acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 12 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
