FS50164614: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
 
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50164614
|dn_ref=FS50164614
|dn_date=19/11/2009
|dn_date=19 November 2009
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
|dn_summary=The complainant requested from the public authority information to be found in the diary sheets and court files in a particular case before the Court of Protection. The public authority declined to meet the request on the grounds provided by section 32 (court records) of the Act. The Commissioner�s decision, having viewed a sample of the withheld information, is that the public authority was correct in its use of section 32; however he found that they had breached section 17 by issuing a defective refusal notice.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested from the public authority information to be found in the diary sheets and court files in a particular case before the Court of Protection. The public authority declined to meet the request on the grounds provided by section 32 (court records) of the Act. The Commissioner’s decision, having viewed a sample of the withheld information, is that the public authority was correct in its use of section 32; however he found that they had breached section 17 by issuing a defective refusal notice.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50164614.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50164614.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 32
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 32
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:33, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50164614
  • Date: 19 November 2009
  • Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
  • Summary: The complainant requested from the public authority information to be found in the diary sheets and court files in a particular case before the Court of Protection. The public authority declined to meet the request on the grounds provided by section 32 (court records) of the Act. The Commissioner’s decision, having viewed a sample of the withheld information, is that the public authority was correct in its use of section 32; however he found that they had breached section 17 by issuing a defective refusal notice.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Retrieved from "https://foiwiki.com/foiwiki/index.php?title=FS50164614&oldid=16760"