FS50157117: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50157117.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50157117.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 43 | |dnd_section=FOI 43 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:32, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50157117
- Date: 22 October 2009
- Public Authority: Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Summary: The complainant asked for information concerning HMRC’s Regional Review Programme, specifically in relation to the Leeds/Bradford/Shipley urban review centre. HMRC refused to disclose the requested information, citing the exemption in section 43 of the Act. The Commissioner found that the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner therefore found that HMRC had acted correctly in withholding the information.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
