FS50144707: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision6" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50144707.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50144707.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 12 | |dnd_section=FOI 12 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 16 | |dnd_section=FOI 16 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 36 | |dnd_section=FOI 36 | ||
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld | |dnd_finding=Partly Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
Latest revision as of 22:30, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50144707
- Date: 1 March 2010
- Public Authority: Department for Children, Schools and Families
- Summary: The complainant requested information relating to a patent. After several revisions and clarifications, DCSF refused the request under section 12(1) of the Act. After the internal review DCSF disclosed some of the information requested but withheld the majority of the information citing sections 21, 35(1)(c), 36(2)(b) and (c) and 42 of the Act.As a result of the Commissioner’s intervention some additional information was disclosed to the complainant. With regard to the remaining withheld information DCSF no longer relied on section 35 and section 21 of the Act but applied sections 40, 36 and 42. The Commissioner finds that DCSF correctly applied sections 36(2)(b)(i) and (ii) and 42 to the information it withheld in this case. However, the Commissioner finds that DCSF wrongly applied sections 36(2)(c) and 40(2). The Commissioner also recorded a number of procedural breaches in relation to DCSF’s handling of this request.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 12 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 16 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 36 - Complaint Partly Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 42 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
