FS50140872: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50140872 | |dn_ref=FS50140872 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=2 January 2008 | ||
|dn_pa=Cabinet Office | |dn_pa=Cabinet Office | ||
|dn_summary= authority to disclose the information which it had improperly withheld. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested from the public authority a document entitled ‘PREM 16/21’ referred to at the National Archives. The public authority withheld the information under section 27(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (‘the Act’). The Commissioner decided that there was insufficient prejudice to engage the exemption. He therefore required the public authority to disclose the information which it had improperly withheld. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50140872.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50140872.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:29, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50140872
- Date: 2 January 2008
- Public Authority: Cabinet Office
- Summary: The complainant requested from the public authority a document entitled ‘PREM 16/21’ referred to at the National Archives. The public authority withheld the information under section 27(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (‘the Act’). The Commissioner decided that there was insufficient prejudice to engage the exemption. He therefore required the public authority to disclose the information which it had improperly withheld.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 27 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
