FS50133140: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50133140.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50133140.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
Latest revision as of 22:29, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50133140
- Date: 11 December 2008
- Public Authority: BBC
- Summary: The complainant’s information request to the BBC was for the equivalent geographic telephone number for each of its non-geographic telephone numbers. The BBC said it held some but not all of the requested information; of the information it did hold, sections 38 (health and safety) and/or 43(2) (commercial interest) of the Act exempted it from disclosure. The Commissioner’s decision is that the BBC held some but not all of the requested information. Regarding the information held by the BBC, sections 38 and 43 (2) of the Act were not engaged and therefore it should be communicated to the complainant. The Commissioner also concluded that the BBC breached sections 1(1)(b), 10(1) and 17(1).
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 38 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
