FS50130467: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50130467 | |dn_ref=FS50130467 | ||
|dn_date=20 | |dn_date=20 September 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Crown Prosecution Service | |dn_pa=Crown Prosecution Service | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to evidence that he submitted to the CPS in connection with an alleged criminal offence. The CPS deemed the request as vexatious having had correspondence with the complainant for a number of years. Having investigated this case, the Commissioner is satisfied that the application of section 14 by the public authority was correct. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to evidence that he submitted to the CPS in connection with an alleged criminal offence. The CPS deemed the request as vexatious having had correspondence with the complainant for a number of years. Having investigated this case, the Commissioner is satisfied that the application of section 14 by the public authority was correct. | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 14 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 22:29, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50130467
- Date: 20 September 2006
- Public Authority: Crown Prosecution Service
- Summary: The complainant requested information relating to evidence that he submitted to the CPS in connection with an alleged criminal offence. The CPS deemed the request as vexatious having had correspondence with the complainant for a number of years. Having investigated this case, the Commissioner is satisfied that the application of section 14 by the public authority was correct.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 14 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions