FS50125731: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50125731001.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50125731001.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision2
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 3
|dnd_section=FOI 3
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision3
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:29, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50125731
  • Date: 23 April 2007
  • Public Authority: Privy Council Office
  • Summary: The complainant requested information on a number of matters in relation to the University Visitor. PCO refused to supply this information on the grounds that it did not hold the information for the purposes of FOI. The Commissioner has decided that PCO was correct to refuse to disclose this information on the basis that it does not hold the information under section 3(2) of the Act and that it responded to the complainant within the timescales set out in section 10 of the Act. Information Tribunal appeal EA/2007/0132 part allowed.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]