FS50117048: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50117048.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50117048.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 30 | |dnd_section=FOI 30 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 38 | |dnd_section=FOI 38 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:27, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50117048
- Date: 22 February 2007
- Public Authority: Chief Officer South Yorkshire Police
- Summary: The complainant requested a copy of a photograph of a police crew bus caught speeding. The public authority refused to release the information on the basis it was exempt under sections 30, 38 and 40 of the Act. The Commissioner’s decision is that the exemptions at sections 38 and 40 were not engaged and that whilst section 30 was engaged, the public interest in disclosing the information was not outweighed by the public interest in withholding it. Consequently, the complaint is upheld.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 30 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 38 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
