FS50102023: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50102023 | |dn_ref=FS50102023 | ||
|dn_date=28 | |dn_date=28 February 2008 | ||
|dn_pa=Cabinet Office | |dn_pa=Cabinet Office | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested all the documents held by the Cabinet Office in relation to the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. The Cabinet Office refused to confirm or deny if information is held under section 23(5) and 24(2) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and has upheld the application of section 23(5) and 24(2) to neither confirm nor deny if information is held. The Commissioner also found that the Cabinet | |dn_summary=The complainant requested all the documents held by the Cabinet Office in relation to the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. The Cabinet Office refused to confirm or deny if information is held under section 23(5) and 24(2) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and has upheld the application of section 23(5) and 24(2) to neither confirm nor deny if information is held. The Commissioner also found that the Cabinet Office’s refusal notice breached section 17 of the Act. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50102023.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50102023.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 23 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 24 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:26, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50102023
- Date: 28 February 2008
- Public Authority: Cabinet Office
- Summary: The complainant requested all the documents held by the Cabinet Office in relation to the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. The Cabinet Office refused to confirm or deny if information is held under section 23(5) and 24(2) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and has upheld the application of section 23(5) and 24(2) to neither confirm nor deny if information is held. The Commissioner also found that the Cabinet Office’s refusal notice breached section 17 of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 23 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 24 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
