FS50093233: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
XML import
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50093233
|dn_ref=FS50093233
|dn_date=30/01/2007
|dn_date=30 January 2007
|dn_pa=New Forest District Council
|dn_pa=New Forest District Council
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information about a complaint concerning a potential breach of planning regulations on his property. The public authority released some of the information but refused to release the name and address of the informant on the basis that it was exempt under sections 30 and 40(2) of the Act. Having considered the relevant provisions of the Act and the submissions received from both parties, the Commissioner is satisfied that the public authority has validly withheld the requested information.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information about a complaint concerning a potential breach of planning regulations on his property. The public authority released some of the information but refused to release the name and address of the informant on the basis that it was exempt under sections 30 and 40(2) of the Act. Having considered the relevant provisions of the Act and the submissions received from both parties, the Commissioner is satisfied that the public authority has validly withheld the requested information.

Latest revision as of 22:25, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50093233
  • Date: 30 January 2007
  • Public Authority: New Forest District Council
  • Summary: The complainant requested information about a complaint concerning a potential breach of planning regulations on his property. The public authority released some of the information but refused to release the name and address of the informant on the basis that it was exempt under sections 30 and 40(2) of the Act. Having considered the relevant provisions of the Act and the submissions received from both parties, the Commissioner is satisfied that the public authority has validly withheld the requested information.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]