FS50085372: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
 
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50085372
|dn_ref=FS50085372
|dn_date=09/10/2007
|dn_date=9 October 2007
|dn_pa=Department for Culture, Media and Sport
|dn_pa=Department for Culture, Media and Sport
|dn_summary=The public authority refused the complainant�s information request on the grounds of cost. The Commissioner finds that the public authority estimated the cost of complying with the request correctly but failed to comply with section 10 of the Act in that it did not respond to the request within 20 working days. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
|dn_summary=The public authority refused the complainant’s information request on the grounds of cost. The Commissioner finds that the public authority estimated the cost of complying with the request correctly but failed to comply with section 10 of the Act in that it did not respond to the request within 20 working days. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50085372.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50085372.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 12
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 12
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:24, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50085372
  • Date: 9 October 2007
  • Public Authority: Department for Culture, Media and Sport
  • Summary: The public authority refused the complainant’s information request on the grounds of cost. The Commissioner finds that the public authority estimated the cost of complying with the request correctly but failed to comply with section 10 of the Act in that it did not respond to the request within 20 working days. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]