FS50082955: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
 
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50082955
|dn_ref=FS50082955
|dn_date=02/01/2008
|dn_date=2 January 2008
|dn_pa=Financial Services Authority
|dn_pa=Financial Services Authority
|dn_summary=The complainant requested a copy of a draft report prepared by FIMBRA (Financial Intermediaries, Managers and Brokers Regulatory Association), a predecessor of the Financial Services Authority (FSA). The FSA withheld the draft report under sections 43 and 44 of the Act. The Commissioner investigated the application of these exemptions and found that FSA was correct to apply both of them. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2008/0002 has been dismissed.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested a copy of a draft report prepared by FIMBRA (Financial Intermediaries, Managers and Brokers Regulatory Association), a predecessor of the Financial Services Authority (FSA). The FSA withheld the draft report under sections 43 and 44 of the Act. The Commissioner investigated the application of these exemptions and found that FSA was correct to apply both of them. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2008/0002 has been dismissed.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 44
|dnd_section=FOI 43
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 44
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:24, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50082955
  • Date: 2 January 2008
  • Public Authority: Financial Services Authority
  • Summary: The complainant requested a copy of a draft report prepared by FIMBRA (Financial Intermediaries, Managers and Brokers Regulatory Association), a predecessor of the Financial Services Authority (FSA). The FSA withheld the draft report under sections 43 and 44 of the Act. The Commissioner investigated the application of these exemptions and found that FSA was correct to apply both of them. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2008/0002 has been dismissed.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]