FS50080312: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50080312.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50080312.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 32 | |dnd_section=FOI 32 | ||
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld | |dnd_finding=Partly Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
Latest revision as of 22:24, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50080312
- Date: 7 August 2007
- Public Authority: Doncaster MBC
- Summary: The complainant requested information held by the authority on the result of any legal action it took against a third party. The authority confirmed that it held information relevant to the request but refused to disclose this on the basis that the exemptions under section 32 (court records) and 41 (information provided in confidence) of the Act applied. The Commissioner's decision is that the exemption in section 32 is not engaged by the majority of this information. He has also decided that section 41 is not engaged. The majority of the information should therefore be disclosed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 32 - Complaint Partly Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 41 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
