FS50074577: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50074577 | |dn_ref=FS50074577 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=9 June 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Metropolitan Police Service | |dn_pa=Metropolitan Police Service | ||
|dn_summary=On 8 February 2005 the complainant sent in a request for | |dn_summary=On 8 February 2005 the complainant sent in a request for ‘a list of all reviews and audits of the police prosecution of Colin Stagg for the murder of Rachel Nickell in 1992’. The Police refused to provide the information citing the exemptions contained within the Act under Section 30 (Investigations and proceedings conducted by public authorities), Section 38 (Health and Safety), Section 40 (Personal Information) and Section 41 (Information provided in Confidence). Following an investigation the Commissioner has decided that the Police dealt with the request correctly as the exemption at section 30 of the Act is engaged and the public interest requires that the information not be disclosed. Accordingly there is no remedial action that the Commissioner requires the Public Authority to take. As the Commissioner decided that section 30 was sufficient to warrant withholding the information while the investigation continues, he did not proceed to a decision on the other exemptions cited by the Police which may have been relevant. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs_50074577 dn.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs_50074577 dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:23, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50074577
- Date: 9 June 2006
- Public Authority: Metropolitan Police Service
- Summary: On 8 February 2005 the complainant sent in a request for ‘a list of all reviews and audits of the police prosecution of Colin Stagg for the murder of Rachel Nickell in 1992’. The Police refused to provide the information citing the exemptions contained within the Act under Section 30 (Investigations and proceedings conducted by public authorities), Section 38 (Health and Safety), Section 40 (Personal Information) and Section 41 (Information provided in Confidence). Following an investigation the Commissioner has decided that the Police dealt with the request correctly as the exemption at section 30 of the Act is engaged and the public interest requires that the information not be disclosed. Accordingly there is no remedial action that the Commissioner requires the Public Authority to take. As the Commissioner decided that section 30 was sufficient to warrant withholding the information while the investigation continues, he did not proceed to a decision on the other exemptions cited by the Police which may have been relevant.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
