FS50073305: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50073305 | |dn_ref=FS50073305 | ||
|dn_date=20 | |dn_date=20 September 2006 | ||
|dn_pa=Hull City Council | |dn_pa=Hull City Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant asked whether the | |dn_summary=The complainant asked whether the council’s senior legal officer had declared her private business interests as required by the council’s code of conduct. The Council confirmed that the officer had done so at all times. The complainant also asked for documentary proof. The Council withheld several documents on the grounds that they contained personal information, that they had been provided in confidence and that their release was prohibited by statute. The Commissioner decided that the documentation and the information they contained was exempt from disclosure. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs50073305_dn.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/fs50073305_dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:23, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50073305
- Date: 20 September 2006
- Public Authority: Hull City Council
- Summary: The complainant asked whether the council’s senior legal officer had declared her private business interests as required by the council’s code of conduct. The Council confirmed that the officer had done so at all times. The complainant also asked for documentary proof. The Council withheld several documents on the grounds that they contained personal information, that they had been provided in confidence and that their release was prohibited by statute. The Commissioner decided that the documentation and the information they contained was exempt from disclosure.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
