FS50072311: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50072311 | |dn_ref=FS50072311 | ||
|dn_date=24 | |dn_date=24 November 2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Royal Mail | |dn_pa=Royal Mail | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information about street storage boxes, specifically the location of those broken into in Glasgow in the last year. Royal Mail responded to the applicant stating that the information is exempt from disclosure under section 30 (Investigations and proceedings conducted by public authorities) with the public interest in favour of maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner had considered the public interest arguments, both for and against disclosure, and concurs with the assessment of the public authority. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this appeal. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information about street storage boxes, specifically the location of those broken into in Glasgow in the last year. Royal Mail responded to the applicant stating that the information is exempt from disclosure under section 30 (Investigations and proceedings conducted by public authorities) with the public interest in favour of maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner had considered the public interest arguments, both for and against disclosure, and concurs with the assessment of the public authority. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this appeal. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:23, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50072311
- Date: 24 November 2005
- Public Authority: Royal Mail
- Summary: The complainant requested information about street storage boxes, specifically the location of those broken into in Glasgow in the last year. Royal Mail responded to the applicant stating that the information is exempt from disclosure under section 30 (Investigations and proceedings conducted by public authorities) with the public interest in favour of maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner had considered the public interest arguments, both for and against disclosure, and concurs with the assessment of the public authority. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this appeal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 30 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
