FS50069257: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
 
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50069257
|dn_ref=FS50069257
|dn_date=07/11/2005
|dn_date=7 November 2005
|dn_pa=York Hospitals NHS Trust
|dn_pa=York Hospitals NHS Trust
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to a particular workplace grievance procedure. The request was refused under section 40 (personal information). The Commissioner decided that if the third party personal data (including that about individuals who had consented to information being disclosed to the complainant) was disclosed�to the general public there would be a breach of the first data protection principle. Therefore the exemption provided by section 40(2) was applicable.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to a particular workplace grievance procedure. The request was refused under section 40 (personal information). The Commissioner decided that if the third party personal data (including that about individuals who had consented to information being disclosed to the complainant) was disclosed to the general public there would be a breach of the first data protection principle. Therefore the exemption provided by section 40(2) was applicable.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/decision_notice_69257.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/decision_notice_69257.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 40
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:23, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50069257
  • Date: 7 November 2005
  • Public Authority: York Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Summary: The complainant requested information relating to a particular workplace grievance procedure. The request was refused under section 40 (personal information). The Commissioner decided that if the third party personal data (including that about individuals who had consented to information being disclosed to the complainant) was disclosed to the general public there would be a breach of the first data protection principle. Therefore the exemption provided by section 40(2) was applicable.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]