FER0178169: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FER0178169 | |dn_ref=FER0178169 | ||
|dn_date=27 | |dn_date=27 January 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Transport for London | |dn_pa=Transport for London | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant made a request to Transport for London ( | |dn_summary=The complainant made a request to Transport for London (“TfL”) for copies of the legal advice and correspondence it had received in relation to the introduction of the London Low Emission Zone. TfL refused to disclose this information as it believed that regulation 12(5)(b) of the EIR applied, and the public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the public interest in disclosure. After investigating the case the Commissioner decided that regulation 12(5)(b) was engaged, and that the public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. Therefore he has decided that TfL was correct to withhold the information in question. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fer_0178169.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fer_0178169.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=EIR 12(5)(b) | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:21, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0178169
- Date: 27 January 2009
- Public Authority: Transport for London
- Summary: The complainant made a request to Transport for London (“TfL”) for copies of the legal advice and correspondence it had received in relation to the introduction of the London Low Emission Zone. TfL refused to disclose this information as it believed that regulation 12(5)(b) of the EIR applied, and the public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the public interest in disclosure. After investigating the case the Commissioner decided that regulation 12(5)(b) was engaged, and that the public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. Therefore he has decided that TfL was correct to withhold the information in question.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12(5)(b) - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
