FER0061168: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FER0061168 | |dn_ref=FER0061168 | ||
|dn_date=20 | |dn_date=20 July 2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Kings Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council | |dn_pa=Kings Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant alleged that the charges for providing copies of a planning application were excessive. The Commissioner notes recent reductions in these charges and accepts that the Council has satisfied itself that its charges do not exceed a reasonable amount in accordance with Part 2, paragraph 8(3) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004. The complainant appealed to the Information Tribunal who upheld the appeal and issued a substitute notice, this is available at www.informationtribunal.gov.uk. | |dn_summary=The complainant alleged that the charges for providing copies of a planning application were excessive. The Commissioner notes recent reductions in these charges and accepts that the Council has satisfied itself that its charges do not exceed a reasonable amount in accordance with Part 2, paragraph 8(3) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004. The complainant appealed to the Information Tribunal who upheld the appeal and issued a substitute notice, this is available at www.informationtribunal.gov.uk. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/61168 | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/61168 dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
Latest revision as of 23:20, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0061168
- Date: 20 July 2005
- Public Authority: Kings Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council
- Summary: The complainant alleged that the charges for providing copies of a planning application were excessive. The Commissioner notes recent reductions in these charges and accepts that the Council has satisfied itself that its charges do not exceed a reasonable amount in accordance with Part 2, paragraph 8(3) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004. The complainant appealed to the Information Tribunal who upheld the appeal and issued a substitute notice, this is available at www.informationtribunal.gov.uk.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 8 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
